Two weeks ago, in our May 29 update, we left this story in an active negotiation phase: Fender had won a copyright ruling in Germany, sent a cease-and-desist letter to US boutique builder LsL Instruments, and then publicly softened its tone. Since then, two new threads have emerged. A legal analysis dug into the fine print of that original German ruling, and the guitar-building community made its feelings about Fender's "clarification" very clear.
Neither thread changes the bottom line from last time. But both add useful detail if you're a player, a builder, or just someone who's been following our original coverage of this lawsuit since it started in March.
Key Takeaways
- A June 2026 Law Commentary analysis confirmed the March 2026 Düsseldorf ruling was a default judgment against a China-based seller offering Stratocaster-shaped guitars on AliExpress (Law Commentary, 2026).
- Fender's repeated position, per Guitar World on May 27, 2026, is that it's targeting guitars that "closely or completely replicate" the Stratocaster body — not every double-cutaway design.
- Via law firm Bird & Bird, Fender said "everybody is welcome" to keep making double-cutaway or two-horned guitars designed "sufficiently different" from the Stratocaster.
- Fender says several builders have "reached out" for settlement talks, but no settlements or letter withdrawals — including for LsL Instruments — have been publicly confirmed.
- On Reddit's r/Guitar, builder reaction to Fender's clarification is split between cautious relief and continued distrust of the company's intentions.
What's Actually New Since Our Last Update?
The legal situation hasn't moved much since May 29, 2026 — but two new pieces of context reframe what we already knew. First, Law Commentary published an analysis in June 2026 that traces the March ruling back to its actual source: a default judgment against an absentee AliExpress seller, not a contested case against a real boutique shop. Second, the guitar-building community has had two weeks to react to Fender's "close copies only" framing, and that reaction is now visible in places like Reddit's r/Guitar.
Was the Düsseldorf Ruling Really a Win for Fender?
The March 2026 Düsseldorf ruling that started this entire story wasn't a contested win against a real opponent. According to Law Commentary's June 2026 analysis, the case Fender's lawyers point to was a default judgment against a China-based seller who offered Stratocaster-shaped guitars on AliExpress and shipped them into Germany — and who never showed up to contest the case (Law Commentary, 2026).
That's a meaningfully different starting point than the headlines suggested back in March. A default judgment means no defense was presented and no legal argument was tested — the court simply ruled because nobody showed up to argue the other side. Fender now cites that uncontested ruling as the legal foundation for cease-and-desist letters sent to builders like LsL Instruments, who absolutely would show up and fight. Whether that foundation holds up against a builder willing to defend itself in court is the open question this story still hasn't answered.
Is Fender Really Only Targeting "Close Copies"?
Fender hasn't issued a new public statement since late May, but the May 27, 2026 Guitar World report containing that statement has continued to circulate, and it's worth restating clearly because it's still the company's official position. Via Bird & Bird, Fender said it focuses on "products that either closely or completely replicate the exact body design of the Stratocaster itself," and that guitars sharing "general design elements of a similar overall layout while remaining clearly distinct" are not its target (Guitar World, May 27, 2026).
"Everybody is welcome and will be able to continue making and selling double cutaway and/or two horned [electric guitars], as long as they are designed sufficiently different from the Fender Stratocaster." — Fender, via Bird & Bird, reported by Guitar World, May 27, 2026
Fender also said its "focus has been on working directly with companies to find practical paths forward," and that a number of builders have "reached out" and entered "reasonable settlement discussions on the premise that they will discontinue making and/or selling the 'Stratocaster' clones" (Guitar World, May 27, 2026). What that statement doesn't say is which builders, or whether LsL Instruments is among them.
How the Guitar Community Is Reacting
As of June 2026, builder reaction to Fender's clarification on Reddit's r/Guitar is split. Some commenters read the "close copies only" framing as a real narrowing — proof Fender is drawing a line around near-clones rather than the entire double-cutaway category. Others argue the initial reports of demanded production stops and possible inventory destruction already did the damage, regardless of how the company's messaging has since softened (Reddit r/Guitar, 2026).
One detail from the community discussion stood out: at least one affected builder reportedly brought in guitar-industry attorney Ron Bienstock to represent its position, a sign that some recipients are preparing to push back rather than quietly comply (Reddit r/Guitar, 2026). If a builder with real legal representation contests Fender's position in court, that would be the first genuinely tested case in this entire saga — a very different scenario than the uncontested German default judgment this all started with.
What This Means If You're Shopping for an S-Style Guitar Right Now
For players, nothing here changes the practical guidance from our May 29 update. Fender's enforcement is aimed at builders and sellers, not buyers, and the strongest legal exposure remains tied to guitars manufactured for or shipped into the EU. If you're shopping for an S-style alternative in the US right now, see our breakdown of S-style guitars that bring genuinely distinct design choices to the format — the builders pushing the shape forward are in a very different position than the ones being accused of close-copying it.
Free Guitar Resources
Getting started with electric guitar? We've got you covered.
Chord charts, scale guides, a 4-week practice plan, and more — free for MTWL readers.
Download Free Resources →My Take — A Conversation with Mark Claiborne
Fender's restated "everybody is welcome... sufficiently different" line is getting more circulation this week. Does that ease the concerns you raised in our last update?
No, it doesn't ease my concerns. When I read that statement again — restated, two weeks later, with nothing else actually changed — it comes across as: "This hasn't gone over well with our customers, so let's walk it back a little, while we keep applying pressure on the market." That's not a retreat. That's damage control.
The Law Commentary piece pointed out that the Düsseldorf ruling Fender keeps citing was a default judgment — the seller never showed up to contest it. Does that change how you read it?
Honestly, that part doesn't matter much to me. Fender took on a defendant they knew wouldn't contest it — that's not a meaningful legal test. What matters is what they do with the win. The real question is: how do they take this momentum and apply it to bigger builders? I'd never even heard of LsL Instruments before this story, and I'm not sure how popular they are overseas. But you have to ask — is a shop like that actually a threat to the volume of guitars Fender sells every year? I don't think it is.
What's the mood you're picking up — from builders, players, your bands and students, online communities?
Negative, across the board. I'm seeing people say things about Fender they clearly felt before but never said out loud. One thing stood out to me: Fender is framing this as protecting Leo Fender's legacy and his original design.
But Leo Fender sold the company to CBS on January 5, 1965. Once his non-compete with CBS ended, he went on to co-found G&L — and built guitars that improved on the Stratocaster shape precisely because that design wasn't locked down (Guitar World, retrieved 2026-06-15). So Fender is celebrating the guy who invented the design while going after people for doing exactly what he did with it. He spent his whole post-Fender career trying to make it better. That's the part of this "legacy" argument nobody's talking about.
Three posts into this story now — where do you land overall?
Same place I landed in the first post. I own several S-style guitars, and not all of them are Fenders — and that's a good thing. As a musician, competition makes me better. It should work the same way for guitar makers. Instead of pouring energy into cease-and-desist letters, put that energy into making a better guitar. That's the kind of competition that actually moves this industry forward.
Frequently Asked Questions
Did Fender say it's suing all S-style guitar builders?
No. In a statement reported by Guitar World on May 27, 2026, Fender said its cease-and-desist campaign targets products that "closely or completely replicate the exact body design of the Stratocaster," not every double-cutaway guitar. Via its law firm Bird & Bird, Fender said "everybody is welcome" to keep making double-cutaway guitars designed "sufficiently different" from the Stratocaster (Guitar World, May 27, 2026).
What did the Düsseldorf ruling actually decide, and who was the defendant?
In March 2026, a court in Düsseldorf, Germany ruled in Fender's favor in a case against a China-based seller offering Stratocaster-shaped guitars on AliExpress and shipping them into Germany. According to Law Commentary's June 2026 analysis, the ruling was a default judgment — the seller did not appear to contest it (Law Commentary, 2026).
Has Fender withdrawn its cease-and-desist letter to LsL Instruments?
As of mid-June 2026, no withdrawal has been publicly reported. Guitar World reported on May 17, 2026 that LsL Instruments received a cease-and-desist letter, and Fender's later statements describe ongoing settlement discussions with multiple builders rather than confirming any letters have been dropped (Guitar World, May 17, 2026).
How are guitar builders reacting to Fender's clarification?
Reaction on builder-focused communities like Reddit's r/Guitar has been mixed. Some read Fender's "close copies only" framing as reassuring, while others say the initial reports of demanded production stops and possible inventory destruction already damaged trust, regardless of the later clarification (Reddit r/Guitar, 2026).
Should I avoid buying an S-style guitar because of this lawsuit?
No. Fender's campaign targets builders and sellers, not buyers, and the strongest legal exposure remains tied to the EU market and guitars that closely replicate the Stratocaster body. If you're shopping for an S-style guitar, see our alternatives guide for options with distinct design choices.
Sources
- Law Commentary — "Fender's Cease-and-Desist Campaign Over Stratocaster-Style Guitars Raises New IP Questions for Guitar Makers," June 2026, retrieved 2026-06-15
- Guitar World — "Fender is speaking out on its cease-and-desist strategy," May 27, 2026, retrieved 2026-06-15
- Guitar World — "Fender cease-and-desist: LsL Instruments," May 17, 2026, retrieved 2026-06-15
- Reddit r/Guitar — community discussion on Fender's cease-and-desist clarification, 2026, retrieved 2026-06-15
- Bird & Bird — Düsseldorf Stratocaster ruling announcement, March 2026, retrieved 2026-06-15
- Guitar World — "G&L Guitars: the story of the company that became Leo Fender's swan song," retrieved 2026-06-15